Jacob Christensen

Notes from the Outside of the Inside

Archive for February 27th, 2009

Journalists and Constitutions

with one comment

Just a short note about this: Last week some geniuses at Ritzaus Bureau had the idea to run a poll about Lars Løkke Rasmussen’s popularity. The thing is, that Ritzau asked if voters felt that Anders Fogh Rasmussen’s hypothetical resignation should be the reason to call an early election. 6 out of 10 of those asked said so.

This raises an interesting problem: Neither journalists, nor voters seem to be aware of the fact that Denmark is a parliamentary democracy. This means that voters elect the legislature, but not the executive, while the executive depends on the confidence of the legislature. Yes, it’s complicated but the point is that the electorate does not choose the executive.

So, where did we get to this? Some quick thoughts:

  • Those asked, answered a different question. Instead of answering the question “should the executive be directly elected?”, they answered the question “do I prefer a Liberal or a Social-Democratic Prime Minister right now?”
  • Journalists asked the wrong question: Instead of asking “do you prefer a Liberal or a Social-Democratic Prime Minister right now?”, they asked “should the executive be directly elected?”
  • Neither part can tell the difference between a specific question about persons and a general question about constitutions.
  • Journalists cannot conceive of politics in anything but personal terms. Policies and institutions are considered irrelevant.
  • Journalists think the Danish political system works like the US political system where the executive is elected indirectly by the electorate.

Anyway: If we want to take the premise of the poll seriously, then we must assume that there are very strict limits on what parliament and government can do during an electoral term and that there are some kind of general criteria for a recall of a parliament. And here things will get really complicated.

Hanna Pitkin, anyone?

Written by Jacob Christensen

February 27th, 2009 at 4:24 pm

Falling … Falling …

without comments

As the FAZ notes:

[Die schwedische Krona] durchbrach ihren langjährigen Aufwärtstrend gegen den Dollar und wertete inzwischen 35 Prozent gegen den Dollar ab. Inzwischen sind 9,05 Kronen nötig, um einen Dollar erwerben zu können. Noch im April des vergangenen Jahres waren dafür gerade einmal 5,85 Kronen nötig gewesen.

[...]

Gegen den Euro ist der Kurs in den vergangenen Monaten von 9,28 auf zuletzt 11,47 Kronen je Euro gestiegen.

According to the Danish Central Bank, the SEK – DKK exchange rate today is 65,06 DKK – 100 SEK. I’m just noting this because I still have stocks and bonds locked in Swedish pesetas, so besides the crash on the stock exchanges, my savings are also taking a hit due to the massive effective devaluation of the Krona. The good news is that a) I – unlike a lot of Danes – have received my wages for February, and b) my Danish bank account is 4000 DKK up compared with last month (yes, I know that I should allow for the 28 days of February compared with 3 days in January), even though the HR office forgot that I’m working 100% and not 80%.

Written by Jacob Christensen

February 27th, 2009 at 4:08 pm

Posted in Politics

Tagged with , ,