Jacob Christensen

Notes from the Outside of the Inside

Archive for July 4th, 2007

Rousseau’s Bed

without comments

Alcove with Rousseau’s bed at Les Charmettes, originally uploaded by Chris Bertram.

I write far too little about political science and political theory literature. Perhaps because Danish and Swedish politics is too interesting these days.

Instead, here is a picture of Rousseau’s bed taken by Chris Bertram of Crooked Timber fame. The Rousseau set is here, Bertram’s Flickr photostream is here.

Go on: Procrastinate!

In the meantime I’ll be writing a post on why we never did podcasts in our courses in Umeĺ.

Edit: That’s Bertram, not Bartram. 

Written by Jacob Christensen

July 4th, 2007 at 8:05 pm

Wikiprotest

without comments

Written by Jacob Christensen

July 4th, 2007 at 5:02 pm

Posted in Spare time

Tagged with , ,

links for 2007-07-04

without comments

Written by Jacob Christensen

July 4th, 2007 at 2:26 pm

Posted in delicious.com

Invisible Research?

without comments

I’ve del.icio.us-tagged this article by Richard Baldwin but it merits a special mention as well.

Consider these quotes (you should note that the public debate, Baldwin talks about, isn’t just letters to the editor, it’s sitting in government committees and doing other kinds of public service):

Today’s brilliant young economists are much less interested in participating in the public debate in these ways. I have no empirical evidence to back up this opinion, but I think it is shared by many economists involved in economic policy issues and I had first-hand experience of it during my five years as a Managing Editor of Economic Policy. Young people need publications in good anonymously-reviewed journals; everything else is a luxury.

and

Hypotheses on why abound. My belief is that a major intensification of competition among the top US economic departments has occurred over the past two decades, and this led to an overwhelming emphasis on scholarly output that can be easily quantified – journal articles in particular. Things like sitting on Select Committees, testifying to Parliament, or writing policy-oriented books and reports have impacts that are too hard to measure, so they get excluded from the rankings. Oversimplifying to make the point, what does not matter for the rankings doesn’t matter for academic promotion, prestige or pay. While things have not yet gone this far in most of Europe, the trend is starting. Some European economics departments pay a bonus of thousands of euros to faculty whose work gets published in top journals. Writing an influential analysis of a legislative policy proposal gets a pat on the back.

Actually, it’s not just individual careers, that are judged by these criteria.

In Sweden, professors and lecturers do not have time or resources for research included in their positions and the tendency is that the limited resources available to universities and faculties are to be distributed on the basis of quality – and in political-administrative terms, quality in all disciplines today means the relative number of articles in peer-reviewed English-language journals. Not articles written in the national language, not books and definitively not work which cannot be counted as academic in the narrowest sense of the word.

The pressure on heads of departments as the lowest level of academic management is to make employees conform to these norms.

So, despite all talk about the “third goal” of universities – i.e. the obligation to “interact” with society-at-large – what Swedish (and Danish) politicians and bureaucrats really want, and are likely to get, are universities that are on the one hand more internationally oriented but on the other hand also less engaged and visible in the public policy process and society in general.

Written by Jacob Christensen

July 4th, 2007 at 1:34 am