Jacob Christensen

Notes from the Outside of the Inside

Archive for June, 2007

Copenhagen vs. Jerusalem

without comments

FC Copenhagen drew Beitar Jerusalem in the qualifying round to the Champions League.

The Copenhageners were not too happy about that, citing only a 50-50 chance of progression to the next round.

Written by Jacob Christensen

June 30th, 2007 at 6:35 pm

Posted in Spare time

Tagged with , , ,

links for 2007-06-30

without comments

Written by Jacob Christensen

June 30th, 2007 at 2:22 pm

Posted in delicious.com

EU 2.0

without comments

Following in the footsteps of the Danish Social Liberal Party: EUTube.

Hat tip: Carl Bildt.

Written by Jacob Christensen

June 30th, 2007 at 2:29 am

Posted in Politics

Tagged with , ,

Meet Your Candidate

without comments

I’m not the only one using the fair Scandinavian nights to do some blogging: David Troels Garby of dansk-politik.dk spent the night preparing a list of parliamentary candidates in Denmark.

The still uncompleted list is here.

I should perhaps point out that there is an interesting difference between the Danish and the Swedish electoral systems with regard to personal votes: The Danish system gives parties the choice between three different ways of presenting candidates (basically a “pure” party list, a constituency-based list and an open list – over time the open list has become the dominant option) while the Swedish system is based on party lists with a limited possibility for voters to give preferences to individual candidates.

Written by Jacob Christensen

June 29th, 2007 at 3:36 pm

Posted in Politics

Tagged with ,

What’s in a Name?

with 2 comments

Vital information for potential female readers of this blog: The daughter of Crown Prince Frederik and Crown Princess Mary of Denmark will be baptised on Sunday.

Media are of cause guessing wildly about the girl’s name, so here is for your information the top-10 of first names for girls born in Denmark during the first 6 months of 2006, courtesy of Danmarks Statistik:

[TABLE=6]

If you compare Denmark and Sweden, it is worth noting that only two three or four names appear on both the Danish and the Swedish top-10: Emma, Maja, Ida and Julie/Julia. (Thanks to “JS” for pointing out the missing Maja – pronounced “maya” -  and making me note the forgotten Julie. Actually four out of ten is quite a convergence, destroying my original thesis).

PS: No less than 537 persons carried the name “Jacob Christensen” in Denmark in January 2007. Unfortunately, SCB doesn’t give the same information for Sweden, but I may be unique.

Written by Jacob Christensen

June 29th, 2007 at 3:12 am

Posted in General,Spare time

Tagged with ,

Instant Failure: From the Belle of the Ball to the Nasty Party (III)

without comments

Högerregeln

One interesting fact about the Swedish party system is that the largest of the centre-right parties, the Conservative – or Moderate – Party – is also the most right-wing of the mainstream parties.

On the one hand, this has given the Conservatives good opportunities to profile themselves ideologically, but on the other hand it has limited the party’s chances of attracting marginal Social Democratic voters. In many ways Swedish electoral campaigns have been more about shifting voters between the centre-right parties than attracting new voters from the left.

In policy terms, the 1998-2002 electoral term where the Conservatives – supported by the Liberals and the Christian Democrats – held the majority in the Stockholm City and County Councils, can serve as case in point of what was to be expected by a Conservative government.

The term saw frenzied attempts to sell off council housing, privatise schools and health care services and even outsource core administrative tasks. The councils also engaged in a rather immature sort of demonstration against the national tax equalisation system by deliberately under-budgetting costs.

And finally, the Conservatives were not only a distinctly right-wing party, they were (and were perceived as) an upper-class party, endlessly yakking about tax-cuts for high-income earners in a country where class still is of prime importance politically, and they had great difficulties breaking out of their strongholds in Stockholm and Skåne.

So, how do you turn yourself from a nasty, upper-class Stockholm affair into a nice, classless, national party?

Social Inclusion, Champagne Work for Everyone and Better Hospitals

The answer is: With a little help from your competitors friends in the centre-right camp and the Social Democrats.

Then copy Bill Clinton and Tony Blair and – voilà, electoral success is yours.

Since 1994, the centre parties – the Centre Party, the Liberals and the Christian Democrats – have slowly but steadily been drifting rightwards by emphasising small business interests, educational policy and traditional social values, respectively, leaving the road open for the Conservatives to soak up marginal voters.

In 2002, the Conservatives managed to blow it completely by putting their hopes in a candidate with all the charisma of a chartered accountant, but after electing Fredrik Reinfeldt as party chairman and designated prime minister in a centre-right government they started to get their act together.

First step: Identify the Social Democrats’ weak spots, then turn them into political issues. This was not too difficult – unemployment was considered a major problem despite Sweden being in the middle of a boom, and the 2002 election had also shown that unrest was brewing among Social Democratic voters around the country because of the quality of health and other social services.

Second step: Re-invent yourself as the party of social inclusion. Having lots of people on unemployment, sickness or early retirement benefits is not a sign of social inclusiveness, it is the sign of a failed labour market and a failed welfare state. Creating opportunities for those outside of the boom should be a priority.

Final step: Make the candidate look human. He should not appear to be an arrogant brat or a over-sized electronic calculator. An ordinary guy in a dual-breadwinner family living in a semi-detached suburban house looks so much better. Indeed, make the candidate your message. After all, people don’t like the Social Democratic guy.

Oh, and give your partners some crumbles, like promising to abolish property taxes. Even Social Democrats earn their own homes and would like to get rid of a tax nobody understands. Never mind that economists would be banging their heads against the wall in frustration and sheer disbelief – after all, Swedish media had regularly published stories about a Little Guy forced to sell his home for 60 years because of property tax increases and there are more house-owners than economists in the electorate.

Are You Ready to Party Like It’s 1998?

If former Social Democratic voters had expected job programmes and lots of money thrown into social services, they were disappointed.

Yes, the new government made some bold initiatives but they were more of the sort, you would have expected from the Conservatives of the 1980s and 1990s: The most visible parts of the government’s policies were the reforms of the unemployment benefit and of labour market programmes – stricter rules for qualifying, lower benefits, a shorter benefit period and a substantial increase in the insurance fees while lots of employment measure were axed more or less directly. Low-income earners in the public sector left the insurance in droves, much to the surprise of the minister responsible for labour market policy.

Yes, there were tax cuts but the initial relief for low-income earners were difficult to see and rules for damage payments for traffic accidents were changed which meant that insuring your Volvo would get more expensive. A h€%! of a lot more, in fact, and the insurance fee for all practical purposes acts like a poll-tax on car owners.

Yes, a plan for abolishing the property tax was presented but the big winners would be high income-families with expensive houses in the Stockholm region. People in the countryside would actually pay more in property-related taxes if the proposed changes were implemented.

The problem here wasn’t so much whether these policies were legitimate or made economic sense – in my opinion cutting unemployment benefits in the middle of an economic boom makes sense, abolishing property taxes is economically insane – but that the policy initiatives took everybody by surprise: This was Old Conservatism.

Where had the “New Conservatives” gone?

Written by Jacob Christensen

June 29th, 2007 at 2:33 am

Posted in Politics

Tagged with

The Capital of Scandinavia Revisited

without comments

The “Capital of Scandinavia”-thing (earlier post here) has reached Danish media.

At the risk of appearing repetitive: Rankings – which you should always be suspicious of – put Copenhagen ahead of Stockholm.

Trying to brand yourself as the “Capital of (whatever)” can also be an indication that you are playing a catching-up game. So the real question is: What are the Stockholmers fearing?

Written by Jacob Christensen

June 29th, 2007 at 12:10 am

Posted in Politics

Tagged with , ,

No, But This Time It’s for Real…

without comments

I think this is the 117th time we’ve been presented with the news that the Danish and German governments are about to sign an agreement about a Fehmer Belt-connection. Or the 118th.

Written by Jacob Christensen

June 28th, 2007 at 11:10 pm

Posted in Politics

Tagged with ,

PowerBook in the Dark

without comments

PowerBook in the Dark (Original), originally uploaded by jacobchristensen.

 

Written by Jacob Christensen

June 28th, 2007 at 3:14 pm

Posted in General

Tagged with

links for 2007-06-28

without comments

Written by Jacob Christensen

June 28th, 2007 at 2:26 pm

Posted in delicious.com