Jacob Christensen

Notes from the Outside of the Inside

Archive for March 30th, 2006

Swedish Political Science Is Evaluated

without comments

Writing about your own workplace is tricky, so I will just note that the Swedish Agency for Higher Education published the result of its evaluation of programmes in Political Science at Swedish colleges and universities yesterday.

The press release is here and the full report (in Swedish) can be downloaded as a pdf-document.

Okay – I’ll allow myself a few comments:

  • In general, it is a favourable report even if the evaluation group questions the quantity and quality of the teaching in methods at Swedish colleges and universities.
  • The group notes that Swedish courses are somewhat out of line with the international mainstream as rational choice approaches are given very little attention in undergraduate courses.
  • The group also notes that something is fundamentally wrong with the way resources for post-graduate education are distributed. Basically, the larger departments with many highly qualified researchers do not have the money to accept Ph.D.-students. Smaller and newer departments with few or no highly qualified researchers on the other hand have lots of opportunities to accept Ph.D.-students. (I will note that “my” department suffers from the same problem: We do not have the financial resources to accept any new post-graduate students this year and we deplore the situation. And it’s not just a problem in Political Science).

Written by Jacob Christensen

March 30th, 2006 at 10:42 pm

Posted in Political science etc.

Tagged with

A Messy Week in Danish Politics

without comments

This is just to note that this week has seen a number of fascinating brawls in Danish politics.

  1. The chairman of the Social Democratic Party attacked – no, not the government, but her opposition colleagues in the Social Liberal Party for giving too little space for the Social Democrats. Given that the Social Democrats still are more than twice as large as the Social Liberals, that was a hillarious piece of criticism which has left many political commentators stunned.
  2. The law and order spokesman of the Liberal Party (that’s a woman as well) attacked – no, not the opposition, but her party comrades in the government for undermining civil rights in the proposals for anti-terror legislation that the government is preparing.
  3. Everybody attacked the Minister for Consumer Affairs who found himself in a really dirty affair concering lacking or inefficient food safety controls. You may want to think twice before you order a steak in a Danish restaurant.

Written by Jacob Christensen

March 30th, 2006 at 10:25 pm

Posted in Politics

Tagged with

Elections? What Elections?

without comments

Sometime they’ll call general elections and nobody will come – and no: this is not a paraphrase on Bertolt Brecht. The American writer Carl Sandburg was the author of the original quote. And the “sometime” Sandburg wrote about could very well have been last Sunday – in Germany – and Tuesday – in Israel.

Elections for State Legislatures in Germany

The elections in Baden-Württemberg, Rheinland-Pfalz and Sachsen-Anhalt were expected with some interest from the political class as they were the first major test of the Grand Coalition in Berlin, and you could argue that the coalition performed nicely at the polls as the Liberal Party turned out to be the main loser.

In Sachsen-Anhalt, the FDP lost nearly half of its votes while the quirks of the German electoral system meant that the SPD gained to overall majority in Rheinland-Pfalz.

From the point of view of the Chancellor, the good news then was that a Red-Yellow coalition in Rheinland-Pfalz will be replaced by a Social Democratic government and that the Black-and-Yellow coalition in Sachsen-Anhalt will be replaced by a Grand Coalition. All of this means that the Grand Coalition will control its own qualified majority in the Bundesrat and won’t have to take protests form state governments with Green, Leftist or Liberal coalition partners into account.

The bad news was that not too many voters cared. The turn-out in Baden-Württemberg (one of Germany’s richest states) and Sachsen-Anhalt (one of the poorest) fell through the floor. Only 44% of the voters in Sachsen-Anhalt could be bothered to vote.

I’m a bit tired right now, so I’ll just post some links to sites with a comprehensive coverage in German:

  • Frankfuter Allgemeine Zeitung: Landtagswahlen.
  • Süddeutsche Zeitung: Landtagswahlen 2006.
  • Die Zeit: Landtagswahlen 2006.

Israel: New Parties, Old People and Not Too Many Voters

The Israeli elections must have been a nightmare for pollsters.

First, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon left his own party and founded a new one with basically one issue on its programme: Disengagement from the Palestinian Territories (or most of them, anyway). Upheavals like this usually mess up the finely tuned models used by polling organisations, effectively leaving the result of the elections unpredictable.

Second, the very same Sharon suffered a massive stroke which left him in a long-term coma and probably brain-damaged. Sharon was replaced by his less than charismatic deputy Ehud Olmert and at this point most sensible pollsters would shurely have considered getting out of business fast.

In the end, the opinion polls missed the target as Sharon’s Kadima Party only gained around 30 seats – instead of the predicted 40 – in the new Knesset. Negotiations leading up to the formation of new governments are usually a messy business in Israel and I think that will be a safe prediction this time.

Turn-out was low in Israel as well and if we exclude the demographic and legal complexities regarding the true level of turn-out, I think we can find two general explanations in this case:

  • The question of disengagement vs. continued presence in the West Bank was not the only issue in the campaign but it was a major one. The problem is that while military and settler presence in the West Bank hasn’t guaranteed Israeli security, it is very uncertain if disengagement will have the desired consequences. There’s not much to be enthusiastic about even if you are a dove.
  • With regard to the next government, voters faced the choice between Ehud Olmert and – well – Ehud Olmert. Likud was heading for collapse and Labor is not a major independent force in Israeli politics. Add a scattering of ethnic and religious parties and what you have is Kadima as the only centre in a new government.

For the record: I’ve enjoyed reading Israeli blogger Shai Tsur’s posts about the campaign. His Wednesday Morning Quarterback post is here. You may want to check out his Flikr photosets from the campaign and the election day as well.

Written by Jacob Christensen

March 30th, 2006 at 10:09 pm

Posted in Politics

Tagged with ,