Jacob Christensen

I couldn't possibly comment

Project 52 – 2014: Week 41

without comments

Malmö: Södra Förstadskanalen at dusk

The theme was October. And what says October (or mid-autumn) to a Dane like crisp skies in the failing evening light? The photo was taken from the bridge over Södra Förstadskanalen in Malmö.

Written by Jacob Christensen

October 13th, 2014 at 7:30 am

Project 52 – 2014: Week 40

without comments

Odense: Fisketorvet

Topic: Buildings.

Odense is a city with lacks an overall sense of style and in many ways comes across as an anonymous provincial town. Most of the old town with single or two-storey houses was demolished during the 1960s so what we have now is an odd mix of buildings in very different styles, mostly dating from the late 19th century onwards. Odense definitively does have its gems but you’ll have to look carefully to find them.

To most people, this is more typical: A 1970s brutalist structure placed at what used to be the city’s busiest intersection. It could be any building anywhere. It fills its purpose, but the lack of grace is obvious.

Skt. Anne and environment

This is an also-ran which I didn’t use for the project partly because of the difficulties in catching the Skt. Anne’s complex. This photo has three or four generations of buildings: One turn-of-the-century at the back, the monumental functionalism of Skt. Anne’s (a building housing GPs and medical clinics) to the right, the 1970s red-brick style of Jyske Bank’s building to the left and an older post-modernized building at the back to the right.

Written by Jacob Christensen

October 6th, 2014 at 7:30 am

Project 52 – 2014: Week 39

without comments

This week I inflicted the pain on myself. My inspiration was a poem by Søren Ulrik Thomsen – Vent or Wait in English. I managed to take three photos which somehow addressed the theme.

First, a photo taken while I was waiting for the train in Nyborg on my way home after a two-day staff seminar:

Wait (2)

Second, a photo taken while I was waiting in Glamsbjerg for the bus back to Odense after attending my cousin’s 50th birthday party. Accidentally, the bus in the other direction drove by:

Wait (3)

But then there was a photo I took during a day of tutoring sessions while I was waiting for the next students:

Wait (1)

Written by Jacob Christensen

September 29th, 2014 at 7:30 am

Project 52 – 2014: Week 38

with 2 comments

Rat

… Humour … [scratches head] …

Generally, I’m not too fond of graffiti but this rat* which has appeared at several places in Odense in recent years is a humorous element in the city landscape.

*No, not a rabbit. It has a long tail and I’ve been told from somebody who knows somebody.

Written by Jacob Christensen

September 22nd, 2014 at 7:30 am

The Moderates: How a Good Performance Can Still Be a Defeat

without comments

Elections can have their non-obvious aspects. At Sunday’s general election the Moderates suffered heavy losses, Fredrik Reinfeldt resigned as prime minister and party leader, and his statements on immigration and asylum policy during the election campaign became the subject of many discussions.

As usual, the image is more complicated. Viewed in isolation Sunday’s result was among the party’s best since the introduction of the single-chamber Riksdag in 1970: Only 1982, 2006 and of course 2010 yielded better results for the party. Here, we may note that the 2010 election now looks like an outlier – the Moderates benefitted from the support won by the Alliance during 2010 as a reaction to the handling of the fiscal crisis. Bizarrely, the Alliance actually increased its share of the vote from 2006 to 2010 but still lost its parliamentary majority due to the Sweden Democrats entering the Riksdag. In a way, is was the bad performance of the left-wing in general and the Social Democrats in particular, which cost the Alliance its majority in the 2010-2014 Riksdag.

On the other hand, the 2014 result should give the centre-right pause for thought. While the performance of the Moderates was in the top-four of the last 45 years, the combined performance of the centre-right was the worst since 1970, even including the result of the 1994 election which followed three years of parliamentary uncertainty and economic crisis. This time the weakness was of the centre-right’s own doing with the Moderates, in particular, losing votes to the Sweden Democrats. Given that Fredrik Reinfeldt and the Moderates chose a very positive line on immigration while Sweden Democrat voters cited immigration as their prime reason for voting for the party, this raises the question if a new Moderate leadership will turn the party in a more immigration-sceptic direction in order to win back lost votes or if the party leadership will hope that a large part of this section of the electorate will change its priorities during the next four years.

Finally, we can say that Fredrik Reinfeldt did chose an unusual strategy in dealing with the immigration issue. He and the Moderate leadership stuck to the immigration-positive line all the way and despite all innovations in campaigning and policy making, this points to Reinfeldt essentially being a policy- and not a vote- or office-driven leader.

Moderates and alliance 1970-2014

Written by Jacob Christensen

September 19th, 2014 at 7:30 am

Posted in Politics

Tagged with ,

The Night of the 12.9 Percent

without comments

As the dust begins to clear, the causes and effects of the Swedish election begin to show. The most obvious result was the victory for the Sweden Democrats – opinion polls and even exit polls had put them on around 10% of the vote which in itself would have been a major success, but in the end the party managed to win 12.9%. This is actually a better performance than that of the Danish People’s Party in the 2011 Danish general election, even if the DPP had polled 13.9% in the 2007 election.1

This points to an apparent paradox: One the one hand longitudinal studies show that the public opinion in Sweden has steadily turned more positive towards refugees and immigrants since the early 1990s just as public confidence in politicians has increased since hitting a low after 1990-1994 the economic and banking crisis. On the other hand the SD vote has every hallmark of political distrust and xenophobia.

The best explanation in my opinion is that SD under Jimmie Åkesson’s leadership has been able to mobilise that part of the electorate which has low trust in politicians and the political system and which holds negative views of immigrants and refugees. In a way, the change in support for SD from 2006 to 2014 was less on the mass and more on the elite level. The SvT election study also suggests that SD hasn’t exhausted its potential yet with some 17% of voters stating that the party has the best immigration policy.

SvT Valu

Linn Sandberg and Marie Demker on xenophobia in the Swedish public

Anders Sannerstedt on SD sympathizers

Sören Holmberg and Lennart Weibull on political trust

To be continued

  1. The DPP has of course since then managed to improve its level of support beyond the wildest imagination of pundits and pollsters []

Written by Jacob Christensen

September 17th, 2014 at 7:30 am

Posted in Politics

Tagged with ,

Project 52 – 2014: Week 37

without comments

Excavation

“Longevity” – illustrated by an archeological excavation. European towns and cities are ancient by US standards. Even if I live in a modern house, the street next to it dates from the 15th century. The rebuilding of the city centre here in Odense also means that a number of archeological excavations are being made – I’m actually not sure what these foundations (next to the City Hall) are the remains of or if they will survive the building project but they are a symbol of the longevity of urban structures.

Written by Jacob Christensen

September 15th, 2014 at 6:00 pm

Posted in General

Notes on the Swedish Election Campaign

without comments

As preparation for Monday’s broadcast, I received some questions/themes about the Swedish election campaign and Swedish politics in general. We didn’t get around to discuss all of them, but I thought I would post some notes about the campaign based on the questions:

1. The state of the Alliance: Why is the governing coalition losing?

If we assume that (un)employment and the economy have been the main issues on the agenda, then slow growth and persistent youth unemployment (even if we are far from Southern European levels) must be the place to look.

2. Why won’t the Conservatives cooperate with the Sweden Democrats?

The Conservatives (and the Alliance in general) are market liberals and pro-open immigration. The Sweden Democrats a) have a troubled history and b) lean toward the Nationalist-Conservative pole. We can also note that the Alliance have chosen the Green Party as its ally in immigration and asylum policy.

3. What are the main differences between the Sweden Democrats and Danish People’s Party?

The history. SD were born out of the violent and anti-democratic extreme right of the 1980s and 1990s. Jimmie Åkesson’s project has been to mainstream the populist right and make it acceptable first electorally and later parliamentary. It may take another change of leadership to reach the latter goal. The electoral potential is difficult to gauge – establishment commentators couldn’t see SD enter the Riksdag before the 2010 election.

4. The state of the Social Democracy

First, the Social Democratic platform seems very backward-looking with an expansion of (subsidised) jobs in the public sector as the main electoral promise and the solution to youth unemployment. Second, the party is looking at its worst election since the introduction of general and equal suffrage in Sweden. There is a contradiction here (or rather, the lack of new ideas may be an important explanation for the continuing weakness of the Social Democrats)

5. The New Politics dimension

The original question was about the role of the Green Party and Feminist Initiative, but in my opinion the new politics dimension also includes the Christian Democrats and the Sweden Democrats. That would make up some 25-30% of the electorate. Perhaps the fact that the socio-economic scale is so dominant in Swedish politics despite the strong post-modern character of Swedish society. On the other hand, the SD is the only party which doesn’t fit nicely into the established political blocs.

6. Is Sweden leading Denmark or Denmark leading Sweden with regard to political mobilisation?

In comparative research both Denmark and Sweden clearly belong to the group of Protestant countries which are also high in (post-)materialism and individualism. Sweden looks like an outlier – a very (post-)Protestant and perhaps even post-national country. Sweden also looks to the US with regard to identity politics while Denmark has moved closer to a European cluster. In many ways, contemporary Denmark is closer to a country like the Netherlands. So it is perfectly possible that Sweden and Denmark will follow different trajectories in the coming decades.

Written by Jacob Christensen

September 12th, 2014 at 8:00 am

Project 52 – 2014: Week 36

without comments

Blue September sky and blue waters in central Copenhagen

Blue – as in a blue September sky and blue waters at the harbour of Copenhagen on a Saturday afternoon.

Written by Jacob Christensen

September 9th, 2014 at 8:00 am

Talking about the Swedish Election

without comments

For anyone wanting to hear me speak, I was part of the panel on the upcoming Swedish election in today’s edition of Det Røde Felt. I got lost in an In-the-Days-of-Adam-and-Eve argument at the end but the basic point was: No, I don’t think Sweden or Denmark are necessarily models of trajectories of political competition.

Written by Jacob Christensen

September 8th, 2014 at 6:00 pm

%d bloggers like this: